Sam Davies has been dropping some good retro-related thoughts at his blog Zone Styx Travelcard:
"the past is a foreign country, and we are living under its occupation"
+
"The persistence of love; the time of love. If you love something -
really love it - do you want to stop loving it? Aren't there ways -
perfectly natural, non-neurotic ways - of just wanting more and more 60s
bebop, or 70s funk, or 80s metal, or 90s jungle. And feeling that new
forms aren't just unlovably different but actively destructive of the
love object (because often of course, that is precisely the polemic
charge new forms come loaded with). You could think of it as musical
monogamy - is it so deplorable?Again, the pace of technological
change, as with each shift the new reconfigured medium reconditions the
message, creating new forms and makiung new fossils of the old forms.
(There's an instinctive understanding of how the medium is the message
in the way that people resent and dread upgrades of social media &
its user interfaces, the stifling effect of having to re-adjust even to
minute changes in how your communiques, whether status updates, tweets,
DMs, emails, texts, posts, are shaped). Looking back through the last
two centuries is to witness an unprecedented compression of
technological paradigms, a pressure crushing cultures flat to
destructively create space for thrilling new forms, while the newly-old,
the survivors of the previous paradigm, stagger around like peculiar
living fossils, dazed by their sudden world-historical irrelevance."
+
"Alex
Williams once wrote of culture running out like a natural resource, but
the problem in reality is very different, its chronic, almost
insupportable overabundance. As Reynolds discusses, what seems to define
2001-2010 technologically is rather underwhelming: a technology which
has 'mastered' not matter but culture. Interstellar space remains
unconquered, unless you mean you want some Coltrane on MP3 and you want
to download it out of the cloud in the middle of nowhere. And meanwhile
music history just keeps on accumulating and accreting, not just because
of the passing time and increased levels of output (home recording
online distribution) but the ongoing excavation of its every corner.
The
optimist view on this is celebratory. More of everything. No excess is
absurd. And it rejects any suggestion that this plenitude might lead to a
flat plane, and any negative reflections on glut/clotted music. Partly
this is to do with a very strong cultural reflex towards the
genre-transcendent. Music-writers are prone to getting excited about
certain kinds of juxtaposition or hybridization. I remember reading with
something bordering on disbelief a writer rhapsodizing over a footwork
track that sampled The Lion Sleeps Tonight because - what a thing to
sample! the writer was raving. Except it has been sampled, years ago by
Shut Up & Dance's Rum & Black on either ESQ or Slave [it was
Slave]. See also writers getting excited about auteurs that break genre
rules, crossing Genre X with Genre Y: because it feels like you're
hearing something at once a little bit transgressive, a little but
sublime in its exceeding of borders; to mix X with Y puts artist and
listener in a 'meta' space and promises a kind of procreated newness. It
allows the listener to hear the words (and declare at the same time),
My Mind is So Open! Oh, the Interconnectedness of All Things!
But
genres depend on the negative. The whole grammar of genre depends at
least (if not more) on what the genre isn't as what it is. And the more
densely populated the cultural context, the more bristling with sub
genres and subdivisions, the harder it becomes for things to *signify*
on the same scale. And again, to insist on the exceptional, common-sense
defying conditions of the present era, it's not a crisis so banal as
the old panic about finite notes, meaning finite melodies and finite
songs; its rather a question of semiotics and space: space to make your
mark. Imagine a crude binary of prog - punk, then imagine punk happening
in a late 70s which was already heavily populated with bands already
mining the fine gradations between Topographic Oceans and Ramones.
I
used to think of this abominably vast and persistent cultural store as
like Swift's Struldbruggs in Gulliver, - his thought exercise in
careful-what-you-wish-for addressing eternal life. The Struldbruggs are
immortal, but not immortally youthful, and so end up doomed to decline
into eternal senility. This cultural situation is like a Struldbrugg in
full possession of their faculties, with perfect recall, never sleeping,
ever more frantically twitching with nervous exhaustion as their
synapses fire and fire and fire."
No comments:
Post a Comment