Saturday, June 20, 2026

The Old Musical Express




 









New Musical Express on the 1983 reissue of Charlie Gillett's 1971 book The Sound of the City.  

Reviewer Paul Du Noyer notes that "interest in old music has never been higher", with NME's own series of cassette compilations of vintage soul, jazz, reggae, etc, given as proof. He says the timely reissue of Gillett's classic tome can nourish the evident appetite for history out there.  

1983 figures here as a lull, a flagging of energy, with a wide range of listeners and musicians looking to replenish the era's empty reservoir of inspiration by drawing from the aquifer of the archives.

But as the review reveals, the early '70s - when the book first came out -  similarly were also a moment of "re-cycling, self-consciousness and nostalgia" taking over "from spontaneous forward momentum" . 

Indeed Gillett cites Don McLean's "American Pie" as the terminus of his narrative for precisely that reason.

As so often, the Rift of Retro recedes ever deeper into the past...


















































Gillett's column in Record Mirror - back catalogue grave-robbing is in full swing as early as March 1970, ten years before the big reissue label boom of Edsel, Ace, Charly, et al. 



A record I bought! It features hand-scrawled liner notes by Joe Strummer. 

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Those cassettes whose popularity with the readers Du Noyer proudly mentioned .... as cheap introductions to regions of the past (nearly always black regions), they were a very decent offer and reader-service indeed from the New Musical Express or (should that be Old Musical Express in this case?)












Just a fraction of the NME cassetteography...

I sent off for several of these but then my interest flagged... 

I was still too interested in the present.... didn't fancy turning into one of those tight-pegged pants, short-hair epigoners from a Biff or Serge Clerc drawing, forever (Courtney) pining for some long lost era of quality music....






Still I have to thank this tape in particular - and its compilers - for one evergreen delight


Straight No Chaser didn't turn me into a Blue Note disciple but it did introduce me to one of my favorite tunes of all time



I recreated the Straight No Chaser playlist on Tidal

Also made a playlist of versions of "April In Paris" (concluding that my favorite remains Thad Jones's)


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


Straight No Chaser was also the title of a magazine started a little later in the Eighties. Its founders include Paul Bradshaw, who had written about reggae for NME, and Neil Spencer who had edited NME during its postpunk era through to the era of the archival cassettes.


















The look of that first issue is close to the NME cassette aesthetic, but more august and austere. 

I don't think I ever once picked up a copy of Straight No Chaser - I took it to be acid jazz aligned, Gilles Peterson-vibed, a neo-conservative alternative to The Wire (founded a few years earlier in the '80s). 

It seems to have been more adventurous than that, albeit always looking for the jazz connection in modern music.  Its slogan is "ancient to the future" and they seemed to have liked it when your futuroid musician paid homage to the ancient ancestors, aspired to the tradition of live musicianship, and generally talked that kind of Talkin' Loud type of talk... 

So they had Roni Size on the cover, in 1997, around "Brown Paper Bag" and New Forms. 



4 Hero as early as 1995


(but not as early as 1993)

And again in 1997








































Bukem waxing poetic on CTI....



Gerald, in '96, so when he'd gone off the boil




I'm guessing MJ Cole, or Wookie might have featured later on. 

Am I right or am I right!



I do have an instinct, a nose, for this kind of thing, you see

Probably rather a lot of broken beats.

Mo' Wack, natch










































SNC is rather like a Brit version of Wax Poetics.  

There's that obsession with image - a love of classic-era jazz rooted in the photographs of it as much as the music, you secretly suspect. (And the record design). 

Whereas The Wire, despite a similar emphasis on high quality portrait photography, would have much more in the way of musicians who are image-less. Badly dressed improvisors. Haggard legends with wrinkles and disappearing hair.   Frowning scowlers with jowls and baggy sweaters. 



^^^^^^^^^

Another thing I think is interesting about this area is how much the original fetishized era of music (fusion, John Coltrane and Alice Coltrane, etc) is bound up with spiritual questing in a seriously dedicated, committed way ... but I strongly suspect that the Brit demographic drawn to this kind of music don't have anything like the same degree of interest in their revered artists's belief-systems.... it's probably a rather sceptical and down to earth milieu on the whole.

Nothing wrong with that... I personally don't buy into the creeds of musicians I love, whether it's roots reggae or Pharaoh Sanders... you like the musical outcomes that this devotional mentality generates...  a vibe or drive or aura that non-believing musicians can't reach

Especially with the Brit fandom for this kind of music... the U.K. being such a faithless culture... For us the music becomes its own fanaticism... religion enough in itself

But then the writing about the music in this sort of zone doesn't really go in much for testifying or mystical language... it's a rather dusty discographic sort of writing (think also of the fact-heavy liner notes you get with dub and roots reissues - where what the music is actually about, its motor yearnings, is largely evaded).

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^



Although Wax Poetics and in a different way Grand Royal show that there are Americans like that, I do tend to think it's a British sensibility. "We are the select few white guys who understand the black music." It always rubs me up the wrong way.  For various reasons, but in part because they don't actually seem to understand it that well.  They are always catching up with the cutting edge a little on the late side.  They are all about rhythm but often have difficulty initially with the new rhythm.

Which is one reason - among several - that I continue to believe that Melody Maker had the best, most acute coverage of hip hop in the late 80s and early ‘90s, out of all the Brit mags covering it. Yes, Melody Maker, the paper that had The Cure on the cover all the time. But we also had Schoolly D, Mantronix, Public Enemy, LL Cool J on the cover.

Our coverage of dance music wasn’t shabby either - indeed an entire monthly magazine, Muzik, was spun off the club tracks section of Melody Maker. You can’t say that about Sounds or NME.

All that span plus the sharpest coverage of the new underground rock - why would anyone have read any other music paper during this era? Seriously. 


Sunday, June 7, 2026

Boards of Canada - Inferno (a Hauntology Parish Newsletter Special Issue)

 I have been worried that the brothers’s new effort has not received the amount of attention it deserves. So to boost its profile a bit, here is a little something I prepared earlier (actually for their label, local indie imprint Warp Records). 


^^^^^^^^^^^^^



We live in an age of over-exposure. Too many artists actively strip away their mystique, promoting a public persona first and the music a distant second. Going against the grain of our time, Boards of Canada remain an enigma. Rarely photographed, seldom interviewed, performing live just a handful of times over the last thirty years, Boards of Canada let the music speak for itself.


Where some of their peers in left-field electronica cultivate a quirkily charismatic public profile, Boards of Canada earned their cult love through the records alone – the beautiful, eerie music and the beautiful, eerie artwork wrapped around it. They don’t have an image, instead their sounds have an unique power to conjure images in your head. As developed on the landmark album Music Has The Right to Children (1998) - which was featured in Pitchfork magazine’s list of the greatest albums of the 1990s – Boards of Canada’s trademark style of detuned synths and blurry textures have the elegiac quality of faded family photographs, blotchy Super-8 films, worn-out tapes and beloved vinyl spun so often the playback is pocked with scratches and surface noise. It’s an aesthetic that’s been hugely influential, spawning numerous outright imitators, shaping an entire genre known as hauntology, and affecting mainstream artists as influential in their own right as Radiohead, whose Thom Yorke credits Boards of Canada as a major inspiration during their experimental Kid A / Amnesiac era.


The Boards of Canada sound palette has even crept into pop music, via widely used audio software like Reason and Logic, which contains kits that digitally simulate the analogue-sourced, wavering off-pitch sounds they pioneered, sometimes titling them after specific Boards of Canada tunes like “Roygbiv.” Their songs have also been directly sampled by cloud rap and trap artists such as $uicideboy$, Lil B, Travis Scott, Clams Casino, Yung Lean and Lil Peep, and by the ambient R&B singer Solange. Indirectly and directly, Boards of Canada have contributed to making the sound of chartpop and rap radio weirder and spookier.


But although Boards of Canada are innovators, their music never loses touch with the timeless qualities that make for lasting music: beauty and emotion. They are contemporary electronic music’s preeminent melodists. From “Roygbiv” through “1969” and “Oscar See Through Red Eye” to the new album’s “You Retreat In Time and Space”, their records overflow with gorgeous tunes – elongated melody lines that ripple across many bars (a rare thing in electronic music, which tends to work with vamps and riffs). The duo - Michael Sandison and Marcus Eoin, brothers despite the different surnames – have spoken about how they are not primarily concerned with making dance music, but instead see rhythms as “just a vehicle for carrying strange and beautiful melodies. As far as we're concerned the important thing is that you can whistle our tunes”.


Although often positioned alongside Warp labelmates like Aphex Twin and Autechre as one of the three giants of electronica, the group have more in common with esoteric postpunk and industrial outfits like Devo, Coil, Nine Inch Nails, and Nurse With Wound, or with shoegaze pioneers like Cocteau Twins and My Bloody Valentine. Boards of Canada records are exercises in world-building: Sandison and Eoin are dreamscape gardeners who dissolve the boundary between musician and magician. The brothers have talked about their belief that music involves “powers… that are almost supernatural… You actually manipulate people with music, and that is definitely what we are trying to do.” Fans and critics alike testify to their music’s uncanny capacity for triggering buried memories. As unsettling as it is therapeutic, their music seems to reach back into your personal prehistory and part the mists of time.


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


Parting those mists to trace back to the group’s own beginnings… we find ourselves in the early 1980s, when the brothers started experimenting with tape editing as children. “We used to chop up shortwave radio recordings on an ancient portable recorder, and make tunes out of them by punching-in and layering tracks in a crude way,” they told an early interviewer. By the end of the 1980s, they had evolved into something closer to a band, with a line-up that included guitar, bass, and live drums (as opposed to the programmed beats and looped breakbeats of their later work). There was even, occasionally, a sung vocal, rather than the artfully deployed samples and soundbites they would become famous for. Boards of Canada’s models then were “experimental atmospheric rock groups” like My Bloody Valentine and Cocteau Twins. Something of that dreampop vibe lingered on into their later famous work: a tonally warped blurriness, a misty-minded mood on the threshold between dreaming and wide-awake. “Like when you glaze over when you're listening to something, but you're still there at the same time."


Gradually Sandison and Eoin homed in on a distinctive set of sonic procedures that no one had yet thought to work with (although many would follow in their wake). They became fascinated with the fragility and fallibility of recording mediums, their specific rate of decay, and how this degradation of the material husk of memory added an extra layer of elegiac poignancy to the memories captured in a photograph or a cassette recording. So Boards of Canada started to apply “a process of corruption” to elements within their music, always preferring analogue effects to digital methods. They might run some parts of a track through a defective tape recorder. In one case, they took a whistle melody and “bounced it back and forward between the internal mics of two tape-decks until the sound started disappearing into hell. Like when you look at an image reflected within two mirrors forever, in the distance it gets darker and greener and murkier." By this point, Sandison and Eoin were working in their own studio as members of the Hexagon Sun artists collective, based in an area of rugged beauty to the south of Edinburgh called the Pentland Hills.


Apart from some early tapes heard only by friends and family, Boards of Canada’s public life as recording artists started in do-it-yourself / release-it-yourself fashion with the 1995 album Twoismissued via their own imprint Music70, and followed the next year by a very limited-edition cassette, Boc Maxima. That same year, 1996, they formed an alliance with Skam, a rising young electronic label based in Manchester, through which they put out the EP Hi Scores. Although Boards of Canadaslotted in comfortably alongside the Autechre-style crunchy beats and askew melodies of their label mates, you could already detect a unique sweet sorrowfulness to their tunes and tones.

Skam itself allied with the Sheffield electronic music bastion Warp Records to co-release Music Has the Right To Children, the group’s classic 1998 album. Limned with a set of intertwined obsessions expressed through the track titles and the samples used – leitmotifs such as the unspoiled beauty and timeless grandeur of Nature, the grounded yet spiritual folkways of Native American tribes, the innocence and the strangeness of childhood, psychedelic and paranormal states of consciousness – Music Has A Right announced a new and different direction for electronic music. Its smudgy textures and wavering off-pitch tones stood out against a late ‘90s backdrop of digitally crisp music full of fidgety beats and ultra-finessed production. Amid this wide-awake club of sterile sound and banging beats, Boards of Canada showed that music could still be the stuff of dreams.


Many of the sampled soundbites on Music Has A Right came from pre-teen voices captured from children’s television – kids giggling, sounding out phrases like “I love you” or chirping “yeah, that’s right!”. Others were calm and kind voices of authority, redolent of a doctor or a teacher, or suggestive of the voice-over on a nature documentary. The group’s name originally came from the educational programs, wildlife docs, and animations produced by Canada’s National Film Board, a culturally innovative institution whose work had a nostalgic allure for the brothers, who had lived in the state of Alberta for a few years when their father worked there.


This Arcadian imagery carried through to their next release, the 2000 EP In A Beautiful Place Out in the Country, albeit with a softly sinister undertone. On the title track, a vocoderized speaker invites the listener to “join a religious community and live in a beautiful place out in the country" – and it takes you a while to realize that this is an offer of membership in a cult sect. Geogaddi, the duo’s much anticipated 2002 full-length sequel to Music Has A Right To Children, pushed further into the foreboding with tracks like the ominously glowing “The Devil Is In the Details”. But there’s also something close to a Boards of Canada mission statement in “Music Is Math”, whose recurring soundbite about “the past inside the present” defines the group’s obsession with the threads of history woven into the fabric of now. At a time when most electronic music, from drum & bass to trance to minimal techno, was fixated on increasingly kitschy ideas of the Future, Boards of Canada were more in tune with the truths understood by poets and novelists: Proust and his obsession with “lost time”; Faulkner, who said “the past is never dead. It’s not even past”; and Nabokov, who dismissed science fiction with the comment “the present is only the top of the past and the future does not exist” while in his memoir Speak Memory salvaged as much of his own halcyon childhood as he could mentally retrieve.


The Campfire Headphase, released in 2005, harked back to a phase of the group’s own prehistory, with shoegazey electric guitars joining the customary arsenal of vintage analog synths and carefully corroded samples. Rippling with melody, tunes like “84 Pontiac Dream” and “Satellite Anthem Icarus” were classic iterations of the group’s established style, while “Dayvan Cowboy”, the second single off the album (as the lead tune of the six-track Trans Canada Highway EP), broke out for new terrain with stirring strings and an intricate battery of crashing cymbal rolls like drum sticks splashing into a pool of mercury.

After a long, fan-frustrating gap, Tomorrow’s Harvest arrived in 2013. From track titles like “Sick Times,” “Cold Earth”, and “Come To Dust through to the ambiguous album title Tomorrow’s Harvest itself, the record is shadowed with ecological unease and survivalist undercurrents. Sonically it is steeped in the influence of horror and science fiction film scores by composers like Fabio Frizzi and John Carpenter, and draws deliberately on the soundtrack vocabulary of the “video-nasty” era of 1980s straight-to-VHS exploitation movies. Tomorrow’s Harvest was the group’s first record to break into the UK Top 10 albums chart. Even more amazingly it cracked the Billboard pop chart too - peaking at #13 - a testament to how their fanbase has grown and expanded to new generations of listeners.


Now, after their longest hiatus ever – thirteen years of silence broken only by their celebrated NTS mix Societas X Tape, created for the 30th Anniversary of Warp Records in 2019 - Sandison and Eoin return with a startling new album. Inferno substantially reinvents their sound, drawing on some of the esoteric influences audible in Societas X Tape, while building on the darker atmospheres of Tomorrow’s Harvest.


Where once the beats rolled out calm and steady, inducing a head-nodding, heavy-lidded trance, there’s new rhythmic tension and density, a crisp intricacy of layered percussion and mid-toned bass as taut as an elastic band. Adding to Inferno’s atmosphere of unrest and disquiet is an expanded role for speech soundbites, which in some cases run continuously through an entire song, or are multiply meshed and overlaid to create a feeling of babble - like voices inside your head whispering sinister insinuations. Some of these vocals exude the blank-eyed sincerity of the cult believer; others resemble the kind of admonitory or soothing voices of authority piped out of the public address system in a dystopian movie like THX 1138. Nearly all American voices and often creepily processed, the speech elements woven through Inferno sometimes recall the sampled preachers and talk radio presenters on Brian Eno and David Byrne’s My Life In The Bush of Ghosts. At other points, the album feels like a soundtrack for an imaginary giallo, that Italian genre of psychological horror movie known for lurid, saturated colors, disorienting camera work, and tempestuously dramatic scores by composers like Fabio Frizzi and Goblin.

Inferno is a departure in other ways too: having hitherto largely avoided the topical and concentrated on conjuring up their own dreamworld alternative to reality, Inferno is unmistakably a record attuned to the dark forces and evil actors currently at work across the planet, a response to a world consumed by delusion, untruth, and digitally-updated forms of demonology. It’s probably as close to a political statement as these mystery men will ever approach.


For Boards of Canada have always avoided anything explicit or crystal clear; they traffic in the evocative and the elusive. Everything about their music – the artwork, the track titles, the vocal samples used – is pregnant with meaning. But unlike the blabbermouth self-curators of modern music, Sandison and Eoin prefer not to spell things out, for fear of breaking the spell. “If we were to explain all the tracks and their meanings... it would ruin them for a lot of people. It's more like viewing something through the bottom of a murky glass, and that's the beauty of it."


- Simon Reynolds






















The power of the Parish Newsletter in full effect!



Thursday, May 28, 2026

It's a steal

 








One of my favorite things I've written in the last 15 years or so, is this demolition job on what I called "recreativity" - a.k.a. "everything is a remix", a.k.a. "copying is cool", a.k.a. "there's no such thing as originality"

So it was funny to see this well-worn mission statement recycled in Whatever You Think Think the Opposite, a sort of motivational book of aphorisms + illustrations (an echo itself of that famous McLuhan book with all the pix, The Medium is the Massage).


Ha, ha - the twist at the end where he reveals that he nicked these pearls himself, from Jim Jarmusch.

 Clever-ish. 


But as is pointed out in my Recreativity piece, the key bit of the Godard quote that Jarmusch and now Paul Arden brandish is  "it's where you take them to". 

That, right there, is the aperture, the window, through which creep back the very properties of originality / genius / innovation that the recreativity mavens are trying so hard to exorcise and eliminate. 

Seeing this inadvertently self-deconstructing steal reminded of how uninspiring I found David Shields's  Reality Hunger - the book almost entirely composed of meant-to-be-inspiring quotes from others. 
(For conceptual integrity, Shields really really wanted them to be unidentified, but the publisher forced him to run attributions at the end of the book. So in pique he added some text urging the reader to cut out and throw away the attribution pages!). 

Like, did Shields intend to write a proper book and then just gave up and decided to present his research, in this barely organised fashion?

One of that select company of books I started and just gave up on well before the end. Usually I am  a dogged, tenacious, teeth-gritted, gotta-get-to-the-finish-line reader.

(My favorite feat of overcome-by-apathy is getting to within 20 pages of the end of On the Road and then just pulling over and giving up)

Talking of books...

There is a super-expanded remix of my Slate article on recreativity which is about 18 thousand words long and was published as a stand-alone mini-book to accompany... the French version of Retromania? Or was it the German? I cannot remember!  It's the marshalling of all my thoughts on innovation / originality / nature of creativity. 

It's also proof that the best time to write a book would be a couple of years after the book comes out, if you get me (i.e. it gets sharpened immeasurably by all the arguments you have with people)



^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Another bit from the Arden book, and here he's got the McLaren-Westwood story badly wrong, both in particulars and in his sense of what it meant... 







































Nostalgia of Mud was started in the early '80s. 

(The "beginnings of the 1970s" boutique was Let It Rock and it was at the far end of the King's Road, not just off Oxford Street). 

And those Nostalgia of Mud-era clothes were neither unwearable or unbuyable. They were very much for sale. And became  fashionable very quickly. Instantly in fact, so hot was Westwood by this point.

But the same thing happened with the oh-so-shocking punk era get-up -  the shop, by then renamed Sex and then Seditionaries (or was it the other way round - I can't remember) and its owners got covered rather rapidly in the glossy fashion mags.

At absolute most, the punk look was a couple of years ahead of its time, not thirty. 

What's also odd about this page is a/ the fact that he is talking about originality as a virtue and a value (whereas the Jarmusch steal-it thing is saying the opposite)

And b/ this wholly un-punk illustration on the facing page




Tuesday, May 26, 2026

"enough is as good as a feast" (interview on reissue-gigantism + nostalgia-wallowing audio greed aka the atemporal all your can eat buffet)

 did an interview with a Swiss journo, no idea if he used the quotes... here they are (waste not want not as me old mum likes to say... another maxim of her's appears later)


- Since we buy these CD boxes with all the extra tracks but rarely listen to those because there was a reason at the time to not publish them my question is: Do you see the power of the fetish at work here?

I don't know if it's as psychologically complex as fetishism, it's more simple greed - you've consumed the major works by the artist you love, and maybe all the stuff released in their lifetime, and you think, I want to keep consuming. I want to keep eating this good stuff, and maybe even the less good stuff will still have some flavour, some nutritious value. So you convince yourself that all these unreleased tracks - the alternate takes, the demos, the live versions, the tracks that the artist didn't consider good enough to release at the time - that these are worth listening to. And there is a psychology of consumerism where it is enjoyable to spend money - so these repackagings are excuses to get the credit card out. 

There is a great English expression, a sort of maxim: "Enough is as good as a feast". It's the kind of thing my mum would say, basic common sense wisdom. What it means is that once your belly is full - there is little further to be gained from eating anymore. The satiation point should be your stopping point, regardless of all the tasty looking things arrayed on the table. It doesn't quite apply to music, because it's not a physiological appetite. But if you think about in those terms, you might decide "actually the Beatles put out in their lifetime all these great albums, and non-album singles with awesome B-sides like "Rain" and "I'm Down" and so forth.  That really ought to be enough for anyone. Why not stick at that - however many hours of consummate brilliance that all adds up to?  Why feel like you need to hear the alternate versions of tracks whose definitive form was achieved and released? All the prototypes for "Strawberry Fields Forever"."  In other artforms, only scholars have interested in the draft versions that authors wrote of novels, or all the things they cut out and discarded. Only a very few cineaste fiends want to see the Director's Cut of movies, or the out-takes and bonus bits on the second disc of the DVD or Blue-Ray. In music, though, there seems to be a larger appetite for all this extraneous material. 


- The sixties still cast a spell over our present, especially music-wise, why? Because of the baby-boomers who have money to spend - or because the music was better at the time?

I think there is a romance of the early days of something - when it is emerging. The Sixties was a tremendous surge of innovation in songwriting, lyrics, guitar playing, what could be done in the recording studio,  even what could be achieved in terms of live performance and amplification. There's was incredibly rapid evolution, and a lot of people trying things for the first time - like the Beatles and Byrds with their Indian music experiments. But mostly the music revolution seemed to be in synch with a larger revolution. People talked about the Movement, or the Underground, or simply the Revolution - and music was right in the centre of things but so were a bunch of other things. It was like a pan-cultural surge of innovation and transgression and emancipation. It matters to the baby boomers who can remember it, but it also has a powerful pull on the imagination of subsequent generations. Even as I was into punk and postpunk, I was fascinated by the Sixties and read books about it and listened to the records. I am technically a babyboomer by age - born 1963, the last year before the cut-off point. But really my generation is the next one, Generation X. And the 1960s seemed to me not a discredited thing but really the previous great revolutionary phase that punk and rave and shoegaze all had some kind of relationship with.

- „We will never agree as we agreed on Elvis“, Lester Bangs famously wrote in his obituary of the king. Don’t you feel as a writer about music that the fragmentation of the genre in the age of YouTube will make the narrative more difficult, even obsolete?

It makes it more difficult but also more urgent and essential. You can enjoy music from the past without any sense of history, but if you want to understand it, you need a sense of chronology and of context. 

What has gone - and what young people can't understand - is the idea of adversarial energy in pop culture. The idea that being into punk meant rejecting progressive rock and Steely Dan sophisto-rock - it doesn't compute for them, these kind of schisms and divides. Streaming culture and the internet culture has eroded this idea. You can be into anything, you don't have to take sides. People still have things by which identity formation takes place, but music is not really part of that process. You can be into punk and alternative type rock, but also into rap, but also into dance music - all at the same time. . It's all there for the feasting on.


Monday, May 25, 2026

Spam Risk / Scam Risk

  Dear Simon Reynolds,

My name is ___________________  and I work with the programming team at BBC Radio 4, a nationally recognized Hot Adult Contemporary station reaching more than 1.39 million weekly listeners across the UK, with additional global reach through online streaming.

We recently came across your book Retromania: Pop Culture's Addiction to Its Own Past, and were immediately drawn to its sharp and thought-provoking exploration of nostalgia and repetition in modern culture.

What stands out is your argument that contemporary pop culture is increasingly recycling its own history revivals, remakes, and retrospectives rather than pushing forward into new creative territory. Your analysis of how digital access to the past has reshaped cultural production offers a compelling lens on music, media, and creativity in the modern age.

The way you connect cultural trends with technological shifts and audience behavior gives the book both intellectual depth and wide relevance, especially in a time where nostalgia seems more dominant than ever.

Your work would strongly resonate with our audience, particularly listeners interested in music, media, cultural criticism, and the evolution of creativity in the digital era.

We would be delighted to feature you in a live on-air author interview, offering you the opportunity to discuss the forces driving this cultural “retromania,” explore whether originality is being redefined, and connect with a wide and engaged audience.


What This Feature Includes


• A professionally hosted live radio interview (via phone or Zoom)

• A dedicated on-air spotlight highlighting your book and its key ideas

• National UK broadcast coverage along with global online streaming

• A targeted promotional campaign supporting your book

• One full month of on-air advertising promoting your title

• Strategic media positioning to strengthen your author brand


Coordination & Promotion


To ensure a smooth and fully supported feature, we apply a one-time production fee of $149, which covers:


• Media promotion and campaign coordination

• Radio segment preparation and priority scheduling

• Technical arrangements for the live broadcast

• Advertising placement and campaign management


If this opportunity sounds appealing, I would be happy to share available interview slots and guide you through the next steps to secure your feature.


Warm regards,

______________


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


This scam-spam was probably generated by AI but I would really like to believe a human was clueless enough to describe Radio 4 to me, a British born person, as "a Hot Adult Contemporary station"