Sunday, April 11, 2021

upmixology aka demixing

Really interesting piece  by Jesse Jarnow at Wired about "upmixing" -  technicians who use AI to disassemble classic recordings (isolating the individual instruments that are smooshed together on a master tape) and reassemble them "in crisp, bold ways". It's something that I had long wondered about as the next frontier in sampling - could they find a way to pick out and separate an individual instrument -  but at least to my layperson's mind, that seemed impossible.  Apparently, I wasn't wrong - most engineers thought it would be impossible. But now some cunning people have found ways to do it.  It also expanding the Frankensteinian scope of mash-ups and other forms of recreativity. But more than that it's likely to open up a whole new frontier of remarketing and reconsumption: people being persuaded to buy things they already own in a spiffed-up manner (bit like the radical remixing of Beatles songs done by George & Giles Martin on Love - one of the mid-to-late 2000s retro-events that sparked me to do Retromania, actually). 

The term "upmixing" itself reminds me of "upcycling", although it's more of a rhyme than an actual parallel (upcycling is like a bourgeois domesticated version of "salvagepunk" maybe - salvage punk, depunked).

Choice bits from the Jarnow piece:

"Until the 1960s, almost all popular music was recorded and listened to monaurally—all the instrumental and vocal parts were recorded onto a single track of tape and played back through a single speaker. Once a song was on tape, it was basically finished.... 

"....  software and audio engineers work together to transform old recordings in ways that were once unthinkable. Using machine learning, engineers have made inroads into “demixing” the voices and instruments on recordings into completely separate component tracks, often known as stems. Isolating the components of songs is a surprisingly hard problem—more like unswirling paint than using a pair of scissors. But once engineers have stems, they can take the isolated tracks and “upmix” them into something new and perhaps improved."

"the number of apps and tools for splitting songs has exploded, as has the community of academics and enthusiasts that surround the practice. For creators of sample-based music, demixing is conceivably the greatest sonic invention since the digital sampler that fueled the explosion of hip hop four decades ago. For karaoke fans, it’s a game changer. For the people who own the rights to classic but inferior recordings—or enthusiasts willing to wade into legal gray areas—upmixing presents a whole new way to hear the past." 

"Go-to industry expert on upmixing" James Clarke worked on the "38-CD Grammy-nominated Woodstock–Back to the Garden: The Definitive 50th Anniversary Archive, which aimed to assemble every single performance from the 1969 mega-festival....  At one point during some of the festival’s heaviest rain, sitar virtuoso Ravi Shankar took to the stage.... The original festival multitracks disappeared long ago, leaving future reissue producers nothing but a damaged-sounding mono recording off the concert soundboard. Using only this monaural recording, Clarke was able to separate the sitar master’s instrument from the rain, the sonic crud, and the tabla player sitting a few feet away. The result was “both completely authentic and accurate,” with bits of ambiance still in the mix, says the box set’s coproducer, Andy Zax...." 

"... if the human ear can naturally separate the sounds of instruments from one another, it should also be possible to model that same separation by machine. “I started researching deep learning to get more of a neural network approach to it,” Clarke says. He started experimenting with a specific goal in mind: pulling out George Harrison’s guitar from the early Beatles hit “She Loves You.” On the original recording, the instruments and vocals were all laid on a single track, which makes it nearly impossible to manipulate. Clarke started building an algorithm and trained it on every version of the song he could find—radio sessions, live versions, even renditions by tribute bands....  Over nine months, Clarke sifted through the guitar part a few seconds at a time, virtually hand-cleaning the track phrase by phrase. He listened for stray audio artifacts from other instruments and used spectral editing software to find and eliminate them. For the final step, he set out to recapture the track’s original ambience...  As an Abbey Road employee, he could book time in the vaunted Studio Two, where “She Loves You” was originally recorded. He played his track into the room through the in-house speakers and recorded it anew, to capture some of the subtleties of the room’s well-preserved acoustics.... 

"The first generation of users are demixing and upmixing in creative ways. Some musicians are removing one instrument from a song to create tracks they can practice along to or to generate source material for new music....

" the newest company offering professional demixing services is the California-based startup Audioshake. The company will soon launch a service where music rights holders—both musicians and labels—can upload their tracks to the cloud and, within minutes, download high-quality stems ready for licensing in film, broadcasting, video games, and elsewhere....  Audioshake is also the first company to figure out how to automatically isolate guitars—or, more precisely, a single guitar....  “We refined the architecture of our deep-learning network to be specially tailored to the harmonics and timbre of the guitar....."

" As archival producer Andy Zax put it, “Some 16-year-old making hip hop records on a PlayStation is going to figure out some genius use of this thing and create a sound world we've never heard before.”

"For now, plenty of experimentation is happening in far-flung fan forums, with unofficial upmixes of many equally unofficial recordings. Some fans have been exploring a subgenre that might be called upfakes, fusing, say, George Harrison’s original 1968 demo for “Sour Milk Sea”' with the backing track from a more recent recording by another musician...."

Thursday, April 8, 2021

last gasp modernism / last Gass(p) modernism (or, the opposite of recreativity)

 "Modernists all rode the recycling bike. The modernist tradition certainly rejects certain parts of the past, but only certain parts. Even when you have someone like Ezra Pound saying “make it new,” he’s going back to Provençal troubadours, to the Greeks. At the same time he’s saying this, he’s off stealing something from Confucius. So you can call, let’s say, Picasso modern, but he’s borrowing from Japanese, African, or other sources. This always takes place. What is important is not whether you are looking back (you had better), but how and for what reason. When you go back as a modernist in architecture, you’re going back to see, for instance, in Palladio, what you can discover about the very foundation of architecture. You can find in an earlier writer like Sterne, the very foundations of fiction—its possibilities. You don’t reach back to imitate them, to use Sterne like little signatures later on so people will say “Sterne!” When an architect suddenly starts using columns or round windows or friezes to remind us of the past, he’s probably only employing pastiche. But to go back to somebody with the idea of discovering what the art is all about, not by copying their style or mode, but by discovering the fundamental principles which they may help you to wield, that is what modernists tried to do at their best. Corbusier goes back to earlier principles to find out what architecture is all about, not to dance the Palladian polka...

"So when one returns to an earlier model, it’s not to copy something, it’s to refine the essence of the whole task...

William H. Gass, 1995 interview with BOMB magazine (via Version at Dissensus)

in between the ellipses is this bit 

"I find Postmodernists rarely interested in fundamental things, but only interested in finding qualities of the past which they can decorate a modernist shed with. Most Postmodern buildings are merely modernist buildings wearing a different skirt, to switch the image...." 

That whole section of the interview is him being asked if he's a postmodernist writer and Gass rejecting the label, and saying instead: "My work is probably best characterized as late or decayed Modern end of the road sort of thing, last gasp"

Sounds like where I'm situated!

Version at Dissensus opposes the Life's A Gass viewpoint ("why go back to the past? to go boldly forward, reoriented and renewed") with the counter-view as expressed by Tom McCarthy in the Remix / Transmission monograph, which I took to task in my original Recreativity critique



^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

I had my first shot a few weeks ago - making me an aging Moderna-ist. 


Tuesday, March 30, 2021

ghostmoog

 


Commercial for the new Moog synth bundle by Julian House

(via Bruce Levenstein)


Postscript: And Julian points me to this other Moog commercial he made.  




Monday, March 15, 2021

the word "retro"

 My sense is that the word "retro" was not in common parlance until the Eighties

Certainly when researching Shock + Awe, I didn't find it once in the contemporaneous writings about Roxy Music, although later on the idea that they collided future and retro in deliciously entangled ways would become a critical commonplace

But here's an early use of it from Peter York, in his famous piece on "Them" (a clique / milieu of style hyper-conscious provocateurs, an avant-garde of sensibility) from Harpers & Queen, October 1976

"The Sex people hate Retro, and seem perfectly sincere about it" 

(Sex meaning the people in and around McLaren and Westwood's boutique - and the quote seems to be defining the Sex / punk people against Them's irony and pomo traits - ie. "they mean it, maaan", they're in deadly earnest) 

Seems likely the first use  of "retro" would be in fashion and clothing retail and / or the graphic design world 

Tuesday, March 9, 2021

ex nihilo

 "I wanted to write music that didn't exist"

 - Harrison Birtwistle